Stály Rozhodcovský Súd JSM

English (United Kingdom)Slovenčina (Slovenská republika)Russian (CIS)Беларуская
  • Általános információk
  • e-Iktató
  • Nyomtatványok
  • Választottbíróság kozlöny
  • Planum Tabulare
  • ArbBlog
  • Skip to content

Contact information

Seat and postal adress in the seat of the court:

Stály rozhodcovský súd JSM E2E
Permanent court of arbitration JSM E2E 
JSM E2E Ständiges Schiedsgericht 
 
Eugen  Huber Strasse 12
8048 Zurich

E-mail:

Ezt a címet a spamrobotok ellen védjük. Engedélyezze a Javascript használatát, hogy megtekinthesse.

Ezt a címet a spamrobotok ellen védjük. Engedélyezze a Javascript használatát, hogy megtekinthesse.

Ezt a címet a spamrobotok ellen védjük. Engedélyezze a Javascript használatát, hogy megtekinthesse.

 

Sekretariát 

Mgr. Štefan Aster, zastupujúci tajomník

 

Riaditeľ inštitútu

Michal Lehotský

Ezt a címet a spamrobotok ellen védjük. Engedélyezze a Javascript használatát, hogy megtekinthesse.

Ezt a címet a spamrobotok ellen védjük. Engedélyezze a Javascript használatát, hogy megtekinthesse.

 

 

E2E-Institute for international commercial arbitration

E2E - Institute for international commercial arbitration has been registered ad interest association of legal person by District Administration Bratislava (Okresný úrad Bratislava) by   26.3. 2015 (at first under name E2E-Bratislavska iniciatíva - E2E Bratislava initiative, changed to the present name in 2016). 

The purpose of establishing an association according to Art. III of the Articles of Association is defined as follows: 1. I. research, development and education in the field of: a) the lex mercatoria and business practices, b) choice of law and international jurisdiction of courts, c) recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards, and foreign judgments in the states of Europe and Eurasia, (d) company law in Europe and Eurasia.

II. performance of the activities of the founder of the permanent arbitration court in accordance with the laws in force in the place of arbitration,

III. research, development and training in business tools for members to overcome trade barriers. 2. The Association ensures the representation of the interests of its members, including proceedings under § 369d, para. 4 of the slovak Commercial Code, joint action, promotion and promotion of common interests, and all activities necessary to meet the objectives of the association.

3. By its founding agreement, the Association took over the founding powers towards the Permanent Court of Arbitration of the JSM.

The JSM Permanent Arbitration Court is independent from the members or bodies of association, representing the interests of the association members does not include any interference in the decision-making activities of the appointed arbitrators or the JSM PCA Secretariate.

 

E2E-Institute duly notified its transfer of regular venue of its Arbitration activities to the Zurich to the Slovak Ministry of Justice. Secretariate of Institute at first was located at Thurgauerstrasse in Zurich, now it is located at Eugen-Huber-Strasse also in Zurich.

Below you can find link to the excerpts from respective notifications to the Justice Ministry and from register of Interest Associations of legal persons administered by Interiot Ministry of the Slovak republic, unfortunately only available in slovak language.

 

ves.minv.sk/rez/registre/pages/detailzzpo.aspx?id=210842&full

 

 

https://obcan.justice.sk/infosud-registre/-/isu-registre/reg-detail/srSud/srSud_34

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arbitration vs. Adjudication: UK

2013. február 04. hétfő, 06:43
ArbBlog
“Salmond (2010) has shown the wide range of challenges being used by parties to resist
the enforcement of adjudicators’ decisions.  These (almost routine it would appear)
challenges to the adjudicator’s decision raise the threshold of costs to the parties which
may consequently render some smaller claims uneconomic to pursue.  They also extend
the period of time during which the referring party has to wait for payment, mitigating
against speedy resolution advocated by Latham (1994).    (…)
 
Whilst the adjudication process may reach a conclusion with the decision, that is
not the end of the dispute as far as the parties are concerned.  There is the issue of
enforcement and if that becomes prohibitively  expensive or protracted this, in itself,
could impact on the attractiveness of adjudication as a means of resolving the dispute.”
 
Peter Kennedy, Janey Milligan, Lisa Cattanach, Edward McCluskey
The development of Statutory Adjudication in the UK and its
relationship with construction workload (2010, COBRA Conference)

Bővebben...

Valasztottbirosagi zaradek - a nemzetkozi kapcsolatok

Az 2009-2012 évek között a különbség a felek használatán alapuló minta záradékok B-típusú záradékok  ( AVB JSM értelmezési szabályok a választottbírósági megállapodások és záradékok) a leggyakoribb helyszín Svájcban. Szabvány által megfogalmazott a felek az alábbiak szerint:

Választottbírósági záradék

Jelen szerződés felei között minden, e szerződés vagy a felek közötti egyéb szerződések kapcsán keletkezett vita, beleértve a  hatályossággal, megszegéssel, értelmezéssel és megszűnéssel kapcsolatos kérdéseket, valamint az illetékességet illetően, kizárólag a JSM Állandó Választottbíróság (www.aaa-arbitration.org) előtt kerül eldöntésre, összhangban annak szabályaival és rendeleteivel, amelyek a SZK Kereskedelmi Közlönyében jelentek meg. A szerződő felek kifejezetten megállapodtak a svájci PILA (Gesetz über internationales Privatrecht) 192. cikkelyének alkalmazásában annak érdekében, hogy kizárják a választott-bírósági ítélet megszüntetését, miközben abban is megállapodtak, hogy az eljárás helye (a  választottbírói testület székhelye)  Zug város, Zug kanton, Svájci Államszövetség. 

In Favour of Arbitration over statutory adjudication: Australia

2013. február 03. vasárnap, 12:36
Információ
ArbBlog

Via   the International Arbitration Amendment Act (2010) enforcement of the foreign arbitral awards in Australia has been strengthen. If debtor has assets in more states or territories of Australian Commonwealth, request for enforcement is to be submitted to Federal Court instead of more state´s courts. Moreover Court Leave for enforcement was absorbed in one stage with request for enforcement, which strengthen arbitration as competitive to adjudication based on state´s statutory laws ( e.g. Construction Acts). 

Arbitration in common law countries has been seen as relatively burdensome proceeding, and adjudication in construction contracts was intended as cheaper way to proceed with claims from contracts. In fact , for company expanding from CEE costs of adjudication in Australia would be even higher than costs of arbitration via proposed JSM Permanent Court of Arbitration with venue in Switzerland.

 

 

Bővebben...

A different Arbitration

Parties are recommended to use model arbitration and dispute resolution agreements contained in JSM PCA Interpretation Rules of model arbitration clauses and agreements. Interpretation Rules under § 274 of the slovak Commercial Code are binding rules for parties intention and will interpretation (as for Incoterm Interpretation Rules). Specific wording is drafted for consumer disputes and disputes arising from electronic communications services and networks.

Publishing of Law unity decisions (Rpj) of its Board (in section Planum tabulare) JSM PCA supports predictability of decision making.

In the case of arbitration with seat of tribunal in the Switzerland, parties are free to exclude judicial review of the Award.

Unique proceeding of review of the Award by another arbitrator strengthens cost efficiency of setting aside proceeding and eliminate procedural delays. Possibility of award review strengthens  enforceability of the Award, trough elimination of procedural and law  errors.

JSM PCA Rules of proceeding set up time-limits not only for parties but also for the Tribunal/Arbitrator; longest possible time-limit for case final decision is 90 days.

For the Arbitration Tribunal authority recognition proceeding JSM PCA applies provisions of Code of Civil Procedure, concerning effects of the court´s issued Call for objection against next proceeding (If party fails to rise objection, it shall be considered as waiver of right to object).

További cikkeink...

  1. Arbitrability in the Slovakia

1. oldal / 2

  • «
  •  Első 
  •  Előző 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Következő 
  •  Utolsó 
  • »

Hasznos dokumentumok

  • Štatút a rokovací poriadok JSM účinný od 14.04.2015
  • AVB JSM választottbírói lista
  • Vykladacie pravidlá modelových doložiek a dohôd SRS JSM 2008
  • UNCITRAL Rules as revised 2010
  • Díjtáblázat
  • Források
Copyright © 2012 JSM, o.z. | Webdesign by Riant
Optimalizácia a marketing Tvorba www stránok Riant, s.r.o.